Nos parties préférées

[benoitstpierre]

Mise à jour:

http://lapartiedujour.blogspot.com/2010 ... dinov.html

[benoitstpierre]

En faisant le ménage dans mes archives, je vois que j'avais mis Botvinnik c. Smyslov, ci-haut mentionnée :

http://lapartiedujour.blogspot.com/2010 ... -2010.html

[SteveBolduc]

Salut !

Hier en lisant le costaud livre ''les finales tome I'' par A.Villeneuve nous sommes passé à la mémorable finale de la 13ième partie du match du siècle, du siècle passé.
[Event "World Championship 28th"]
[Site "Reykjavik"]
[Date "1972.08.10"]
[Round "13"]
[White "Spassky, Boris V"]
[Black "Fischer, Robert James"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B04"]
[WhiteElo "2660"]
[BlackElo "2785"]
[EventType "match"]
En effet, il est coutume de souligner les combats d'ouvertures/milieu de partie. Celle ci va + loin..dès le début avec une B04 (une défense Alekhine!).. jusqu'à 4 pions vs une tour en finale, ...,

[John Bleau]

Benoit, ça commence à être dur à savoir si la partie que l'on recommande est déjà sur ton site, mais je crois que celui-ci ne l'est pas :
[Event "Biel International Chess Festival"]
[Site "Biel SUI"]
[Date "2009.07.28"]
[EventDate "2009.07.19"]
[Round "8"]
[Result "0-1"]
[White "Alexander Morozevich"]
[Black "Maxime Vachier-Lagrave"]
[ECO "B80"]
[WhiteElo "2751"]
[BlackElo "2703"]
[PlyCount "152"]

[SteveBolduc]

Peu importe John !

Quelle partie !

27...Th7 !

etc..

[John Bleau]

En effet, Steve, 27...Th7 est un des coups les plus surprenants de tous les temps !

[SteveBolduc]

Salut John,

Je ne veux pas prendre trop de place mais dans un flash j'ai revu ce coup magnifique qui a peut-être inspiré le jeune français..Ici, les noirs sont carrément perdus mais posent un dernier problème à leur adversaire, qui, ma foi, réplique avec inspiration..

=>Solution

P.S. Juste à cliquer sur la flèche de coup de partie. Après la séquence, 'sacrebleu', ça ne semble pas rentrer, nous avons : 1.e7 Tf3 2.Dh2 !! 1-0

P.P.S. POur la forme ceux qui veulent voir la partie complète voici les coordonnées..

[Event "URS-ch22"]
[Site "Moscow"]
[Date "1955.03.12"]
[Round "18"]
[White "Spassky, Boris V"]
[Black "Kortschnoj, Viktor"]
[Result "1-0"]

[benoitstpierre]

Je suis en train de terminer mon ménage dans mes archives et je viens de retrouver Shirov c. Chernin, partie que nous conseillais Serge Champetier il y a un bout :

http://lapartiedujour.blogspot.com/2010 ... -tour.html

[John Bleau]

Du site TCEC où jouent présentement Houdini et Rybka, les "Game of the Season" ont deux très belles parties.

J'ai essayé de les inclure en PGN mais les commentaires de Monokroussos bousillent l'application.

Alors, je vous recommande d'aller à http://www.tcec-chess.org/gots.php et d'examiner les parties Houdini - Rybka et Shredder - Naum en particulier. Cette dernière est assez ahurissante.

J'inclus au moins les PGN avec commentaires, car peut-être que vous pourrez les copie-coller dans votre moteur "engine" (par exemple, dans ChessBaseLite, vous copiez une partie et faites Ctrl-Z dans la boîte de notation.)

[Event "Old TCEC - Game of the Month 3"]
[Site "http://www.tcec-chess.org"]
[Date "2010.11.26"]
[Round "8.3"]
[White "Houdini 1.03a"]
[Black "Rybka 4 Exp-61"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D46"]
[Annotator "FM Dennis Monokroussos"]
[Annotatorsite "http://www.thechessmind.net"]
[PlyCount "163"]
[EventDate "2010.11.21"]
[TimeControl "40/7200:20/3600:900+30"]

1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. Nc3 e6 5. e3 Nbd7 6. Qc2 Bd6 7. Bd3 O-O 8. O-O dxc4 9. Bxc4 b5 10. Be2 (10. Bd3 Bb7 11. Rd1 a6 12. Ng5 Bxh2+ ({It is possible to decline the offer with} 12... h6 {, but White's knight is well-situated after} 13. Nge4 {as in the game Wojtaszek,R (2711)-Van Wely,L (2679)/Khanty Mansiysk 2010/(1-0, 45).}) 13. Kxh2 Ng4+ 14. Kg1 Qxg5 15. f3 Ngf6 16. e4 Qh4 17. Be3 {gave White good compensation for the pawn in Eljanov,P (2729) -Inarkiev,E (2645)/Khanty Mansiysk 2009/(1-0, 42).}) 10... a6 11. Ng5 $146 {This very reasonable-looking move seems to be a novelty. This sally is known, however - see the note to White's 10th move. The idea is to play e4, and in response to e5 trade pawns, push f4 and create kingside play with the mobile pawn duo.} ({Known lines include} 11. Rd1 Qc7 12. e4 e5) ({and} 11. e4 e5) 11... Qc7 (11... Bb7 12. e4 e5 13. dxe5 Bxe5 14. f4 {looks quite reasonable for White.}) 12. e4 Bxh2+ {The principled choice, time-consuming though it is.} (12... e5 13. dxe5 Bxe5 14. f4 Bd4+ 15. Kh1 h6 16. Nf3 $14) 13. Kh1 h6 14. Nf3 Bf4 15. e5 Bxc1 16. Raxc1 Ne8 {Black has an extra pawn, but as it's the h-pawn it won't play a meaningful role for a long time. (That doesn't mean it's not important, only that it's not going to affect the shape of play any time soon.) In return White has a nice dark-squared clamp (c5 and d6 in particular), pressure on the c-file and the hopes of keeping Black's bad bishop locked in the rectory for the rest of its days.} (16... Nd5 17. Nxd5 exd5 18. Qxc6 {is of course much better for White, who regains the pawn while keeping his positional advantages.}) 17. Ne4 {The right choice: if Black could achieve ...c5 without any pain he'd be a pawn ahead for nothing, and even if it costs him the extra pawn it can be worth it to break the bind.} ({After} 17. Rfd1 c5 {White may enjoy a tiny pull with} 18. Ne4 {, but Black's position in fundamentally healthy after} c4 {, e.g.} 19. b3 Nb6 20. bxc4 Nxc4 21. Bxc4 Qxc4 22. Qxc4 bxc4 23. Nfd2 Nc7 24. Nxc4 $14) 17... Bb7 18. Rfd1 Rd8 (18... f5 $5) 19. Qc3 {Tightening the dark-squared screws. By taking some control over b4 and a5, White makes it harder for Black to break the bind. As long as Black's queenside pawns (and e-pawn) are stuck on light squares, "his" bishop will be bad as well.} Qb8 20. Kg1 Nc7 21. Qe1 Nd5 {The knight may look good here, but it's not going to have any help and does nothing to combat White's advantages.} 22. b4 {Further sealing in Black's queenside. If ...a5 or ...Nc4 could be effective, b4 could be inaccurate or even an error, but neither is of any real concern here.} Nf4 23. Bf1 {See the previous note: swapping the bishop would give Black hopes of ...Nc4.} Nb6 24. a3 Nbd5 {The knights look pretty, but they have no targets. The Nf4 can be driven away at any moment with g3, and meanwhile they do nothing about White's positive options.} 25. Nfd2 {Headed for c5 or a5, and clearing the way for an eventual f4 (after g3).} Ne7 {A better arrangement: the knight on f4 was unstable, so Black clears d5 for its retreat while preparing ...Nf5 for the other one.} 26. Nb3 Nf5 {This is a goodsquare, as the knight pressures d4 and covers d6. Unfortunately, although f5is a nice square to visit, White won't allow any Black piece to take up residence there.} 27. g3 Nd5 28. Na5 Ba8 {What a bishop!} 29. Nc5 Qc8 {Let's take stock here. The funny aesthetics of the four knights aside, the fundamental truth about this position is that Black is very passive, but White will have to do something positive to win the game. The natural plan, which will require a fair amount of preparation, is to kill Black on the kingside with f4, g4 and then f5 or g5 depending on circumstances.} 30. Qe4 Rfe8 31. Rd3 Nb6 32. Qf4 Rf8 33. Bh3 Nd5 34. Qe4 Nde7 {The knight stays put for the moment, but at the cost of the other knight's fortunes. Further, White will eventually play g4 and push on the kingside, so the Nf5 has only bought itself a little time it's not staying.} 35. Kh2 Kh8 36. Rh1 Nd5 37. Kg1 Kg8 38. Bf1 {The h4 square is covered, so g4 is coming. Black therefore retreats and meets the threat in a very direct and committal way.} Nfe7 (38... f6 {looks like a more combative option, but it's very risky. Black seems to be okay at the end of the following line, but if so it's holding on by the software equivalent of a rock climber's fingertips.} 39. g4 ({The patient} 39. Bh3 {also comes into consideration, aiming to maneuver some more prior to letting loose with g4.}) 39... Nfe7 40. exf6 Rxf6 41. Rg3 Nf4 42. g5 hxg5 43. Qh7+ Kf8 44. Rxg5 Rg6 45. Rxg6 Nexg6 46. Bd3 e5 47. f3 e4 48. Bxe4 Kf7) 39. Be2 f5 {This slows White down, but overall it's a move White must be happy to see. Now Black has only one useful square and one useful piece: the knight on d5. The e6 pawn is weak and Black's pieces have almost no scope.} 40. Qh4 Ng6 ({The active} 40... f4 {looks like a reasonable option. In this way White can't seal Black in with f4, which means that Black will get piece access to f5 and/or f4. For instance:} 41. g4 (41. Qg4 $14 {is probably a better choice, though here at least Black keeps control over f5.}) 41... Ng6 42. Qh2 f3 $1 43. Bxf3 Ndf4 {and all of a sudden the prisoners are threatening to run the asylum.}) 41. Qh5 Nh8 42. f4 {Sealing Black in on the kingside. The next step is to prepare g4, aiming sooner or later to execute the black king.} Kh7 43. Bf3 Ng6 44. Rd2 Rh8 45. Rdh2 Nde7 (45... Nge7 $4 {isn't so good:} 46. Qf7 {threatens 47.Rxh6#, and} Ng8 {walks into another mate:} 47. Rxh6+ (47. Ne4 {is less forcing but equally good, leading to rather sadistic mates.} h5 (47... Rf8 48. Ng5#) (47... fxe4 48. Bxe4#) 48. Rxh5+ Nh6 49. Ng5#) 47... Nxh6 48. Rxh6+ Kxh6 49. Qh5#) 46. Nab3 Kg8 47. Rc2 Nf8 $2 {It's hard to understand this move, as it takes the pressure off White's f-pawn. Now g4 happens, and the attack progresses.} ({It would have been better to mark time with} 47... Kh7) 48. g4 $16 Nfg6 49. Qh2 Rf8 50. Rf2 Rf7 51. gxf5 Nxf5 (51... Rxf5 52. Bg4 {and now Black can sac the exchange here too, but it's at best an inferior version of the game.}) 52. Bh5 Nge7 {This Petrosianic exchange sacrifice would be more useful if the poor Ba8 could just get into the game somehow.} 53. Bxf7+ Kxf7 54. Qh5+ g6 {Horrible: Black is making it a clean sweep: all the pawns will go on light squares, and all the dark squares will belong to White for time and eternity.} 55. Qg4 Nd5 56. Nd2 h5 $2 {Giving away g5 as well. Black is now unequivocally lost.} 57. Qh3 Qe8 (57... Nxd4 58. Qd3 Nf5 59. Nde4 {and now the only "defense" to the threatened 60.Ng5+ followed by 61.Ngxe6 is} Re8 $2 {, but this loses in style:} 60. Rxh5 $3 gxh5 61. Nd6+ $1 Nxd6 62. Qh7+ Kf8 63. Rg2 Nf7 {Else 64.Rg8 is mate.} 64. Rg7 Qc7 65. Nxe6+ $1 Rxe6 (65... Ke7 66. Rxf7+ Kxe6 67. Qf5#) 66.Qg8+ Ke7 67. Rxf7#) 58. Nde4 Qe7 59. Ng5+ Ke8 60. Ngxe6 {Black's bishop finally has a route to freedom, but White's advantage is too great.} Bb7 61. Qg2 Rh6 62. Ng5 Bc8 (62... Nxd4 63. Nge4 Bc8 64. Rd2 Nf5 65. Nf6+ $1 Kf7 (65...Nxf6 $2 66. Qxc6+ $18) 66. Nxd5 cxd5 67. Qxd5+ $18) 63. Rh3 Kd8 (63... Nxd4 {fails as usual. White is able to take advantage of the freshly opened d-file with} 64. Rd3 Nf5 65. Rxd5 $1 cxd5 66. Qxd5 {and Black is without a good defense to threats like 67.Qc6+ Bd7 68.Qa8+ Qd8 69.Qxd8+ Kxd8 70.Nf7+ and 71.Nxh6. He could try evacuating the king from the center, but after} Kf8 67. Rc2 $1 {the threat of 68.Nce6+ followed on move 69 or 70 by Rc8+ decides.}) 64. e6 Kc7 65. Qe4 Qf6 66. Nf7 Rh7 67. Ne5 Nfe7 (67... Re7 {looks logical, trying to win or at least blockade the e-pawn. Unfortunately for Black, some tactics intervene:} 68. Rc2 $1 Nd6 (68... Bxe6 69. Nxa6+ Kb7 70. Rxc6 $18) (68... Kb6 69. Na4+ $1 bxa4 70. Rxc6+ Ka7 71. Qxd5 $18) 69. Qxd5 $1 cxd5 70. Ne4+ $18) 68. Ned7 Qf5 69. Qe5+ $1 {Opening the f-file for the rooks. The end is near...} Qxe5 70. fxe5 Nf5 71. Nf8 Rh6 72. Kh2 {So that ...Rxg6 (after White's Nxg6) won't come with check.} Nde7 73. Rhf3 Kd8 74. Ne4 Kc7 (74... Ke8 75. Nxg6 Rxg6 76. Nd6+ Nxd6 (76... Kd8 77. Nxf5 $18) 77. Rf8#) 75. Rg2 Nd5 76. Rxf5 $1 gxf5 77. Rg7+ Kd8 (77... Kb8 78. Nc5 {followed by e7 wins a piece.}) 78. Ng5 Ke8 {The only decent defense to 79.Nf7+.} 79. Ng6 {Renewing the threat, but adding the bigger threat of 80.Rg8#.} Bxe6 80. Nxe6 h4 81. Nc5 f4 82. e6 (82. e6 {White is winning because he's a piece up, but more goodies are on the way. 83.Rg8# is threatened, and after} Nf6 ({The utterly hopeless} 82... Rxg6 {is the only way to avoid imminent mate, but there's nothing to hope for after} 83. Rxg6) 83. Re7+ Kd8 84. Nb7+ Kc8 85. Nd6+ Kd8 (85... Kb8 86. Ne5 {mates shortly, e.g.} Rh7 87. Nxc6+ Ka8 88. Nf7 {followed inevitably by Ra7#.}) 86. Ra7 {Threatening 87.e7#. Black can delay mate a few moves with} Rh7 {, but not many:} 87. e7+ Rxe7 88. Nxe7 Ng4+ 89. Kg1 Ne5 90. dxe5 {and} -- 91. Nxc6#) 1-0


[Event "Old TCEC - Game of the Month 2"]
[Site "http://www.tcec-chess.org"]
[Date "2010.08.01"]
[Round "1.3"]
[White "Shredder 12"]
[Black "Naum 4.2"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A06"]
[Annotator "FM Dennis Monokroussos"]
[Annotatorsite "http://www.thechessmind.net"]
[PlyCount "94"]
[EventDate "2010.07.30"]
[TimeControl "40/7200:20/3600:900+30"]

1. Nf3 d5 2. b3 c5 3. e3 Nf6 4. Bb5+ Bd7 5. Qe2 e6 6. Bb2 Be7 7. Bxd7+ Qxd7 8. Ne5 Qc7 9. O-O O-O 10. f4 Nfd7 {The light-squared bishops are gone, so we won't have a Lasker-Bauer rerun. Still, White has plenty of attacking prospects, as we will see.} 11. Rf3 g6 12. Ng4 {Threatening 13.Nh6#.} h5 13. Ne5 Nc6 14. Nxd7 Qxd7 15. Rg3 h4 {And now the excitement begins.} 16. Qh5 {Threatening both mate in one (17.Qh8#) and mate in two (17.Rxg6+ fxg6 18.Qxg6#) .} d4 17. f5 $6 {A funny move. It doesn't seem to have any real purpose, but serves instead as a reflection of the engine's "contempt factor". For those unfamiliar with the term, it refers to the degree to which a chess program is draw-averse. White has an immediate perpetual with 17.Rxg6+ fxg6 18.Qxg6+ Kh8 19.Qh6+ and so on. Now, let's say Shredder thinks draws are perfectly wonderful - not better than wins, but perfectly fine when the position is equal. In that case, it would take the draw immediately. On the other hand, if it's draw-averse, it will take risks to avoid the draw, even if it's worse. (How much risk depends on the "contempt" setting.) 17.f5 at best delays the need for the perpetual (if Black takes, White has nothing better than 18.Rxg6+), but Naum decides that it will go for the win instead.} hxg3 $1 18. fxg6 {Threatening mate, and if Black takes on g6 White has perpetual. But Black has "contempt" for the draw as well, and likewise pushes it off as far as possible.} Kg7 $1 19. Qh7+ Kf6 20. g7 (20. Nc3 $2 fxg6 21. Rf1+ Ke5 22. Qg7+ Rf6 ({The natural} 22... Kd6 $2 {is an error, but it's staggering that after} 23. Nb5+ Kd5 {there doesn't seem to be any way to mate Black's king. Indeed, it's only by dint of hard work on my part that I managed to persuade the computer that White has more than a perpetual check here. Even this "more" doesn't seem like very much, though, but maybe one of my readers can find a clear-cut White win?} 24. c4+ (24. e4+ Kxe4 25. d3+ Kd5 26. c4+ dxc3 27. Nxc3+ Kd6 28. Nb5+ Kd5 29. Nc3+ $11 {is one of many perpetuals.}) 24... dxc3 25. Nxc3+ Kd6 26. Nb5+ Kd5 27. e4+ $1 Kxe4 28. Qxg6+ Kd5 29. Re1 $1 gxh2+ 30. Kh1 Rf4 31. Rxe6 $1 {Now 32. Nc3+ threatens more than perpetual.} Qxe6 32. Nc7+ Kd6 33. Nxe6 Rf1+ 34. Kxh2 Ne5 35. Bxe5+ Kxe5 36. d4+ $1 cxd4 37. Qh5+ Rf5 38. Qe2+ Kd6 39. Nxd4 Rh8+ 40. Kg1 Re5 41. Nb5+ Ke6 42. Qc4+ Kf6 43. Qf4+ Rf5 44. Qd4+ Re5 45. Nc7 $1 {may give White something after} Rhh5 ({or} 45... Bc5 46. Nd5+ Ke6 47. Qxc5 Rxd5 48. Qxa7) 46. Nd5+ Kg6 47. Nxe7+ Rxe7 48. Qxa7 {, but I doubt it's enough to win.}) 23. Rxf6 dxc3 $1 $19 {seems to assure Black of a serious, possibly winning advantage, despite the king's over-bold placement on e5 and the wide array of checks available to White.}) 20... gxh2+ ({The natural} 20... Rg8 $2 {loses to} 21. Qh6+ Kf5 (21... Ke5 $2 22. Qf4+ Kd5 23. e4#) 22. Nc3 $1 Bg5 (22... dxc3 $2 23. Rf1+ Ke5 24. Qf4+ Kd5 25. e4+ Kd4 26. Bxc3#) 23. Rf1+ Ke5 24. Qxg5+ f5 (24... Kd6 $2 25. Nb5#) 25. exd4+ Nxd4 26. Qxg3+ Kf6 27. Ne4+ Kf7 28. Qe5 (28. Nxc5 $4 Ne2+ $19) 28... b6 29. b4 $18 {and White crashes through. Since White is attacking for free (i.e. material is basically equal here), Black is thoroughly lost.} ({The banal} 29. Nf6 $18 {wins too.})) 21. Kh1 Bd6 ({I worked out a fair number of these lines on my own, but Rybka initially proposes an alternative to 21...Bd6 that wouldn't cross my mind in a month of Sundays:} 21... Kg5 {This move looks absurd, and sure enough, once you start making moves the computer gets embarrassed and repents of its original 0.00 evaluation.} 22. gxf8=Q Rxf8 (22... Bxf8 23. d3 {and the next wave of the attack is on the way - Nd2-f3 and so on.}) 23. d3 {and Black will die soon. For example:} f5 24. Nd2 Qe8 25. exd4 cxd4 26. Re1 $1 e5 27. Nf3+ Kf6 28. Nxe5 $1 Nxe5 29. Bxd4 Bd6 30. Qh6+ Qg6 {and now White first regains the sacrificed piece with} 31. Bxe5+ {, and then takes a second one as an interest payment:} Kf7 32. Qxg6+ Kxg6 33. Bxd6 $18) 22. exd4 (22. gxf8=Q Rxf8 23. Qh4+ {keeps Black's king from running away, so it's still a draw by perpetual if White wants it.}) 22... cxd4 23. Nc3 $3 ({The routine} 23. gxf8=Q Rxf8 24. Na3 {isn't so bad, but White continues to play inspired, maniacal chess.} (24. Qh4+ $11)) 23... dxc3 24. Rf1+ (24. Qh4+ $11) (24. gxf8=Q Rxf8 ({But not} 24... Bxf8 $2 25. Rf1+ Ke5 26. dxc3 $18) 25. Qh4+ $11) ({The obvious} 24. Bxc3+ $2 {is a mistake though, as it chases the king to safety. The point of Nc3 isn't primarily letting the bishop into the game, but getting the rook to the f-file as quickly as possible.} Ke7 25. gxf8=Q+ Rxf8 26. Bg7 Be5 27. Bxf8+ Kxf8 $19) 24... Ke7 25. g8=Q {This looks crushing, but Black has seen further.} cxb2 $3 {The only move, but fantastic anyway. White not only keeps his second queen but smashes through on f7, and it doesn't matter.} (25... Rxg8 $2 26. Rxf7+ $18 {would be the end.}) 26. Rxf7+ $2 {Obvious...but wrong.} (26. Qgxf7+ $1 Rxf7 27. Rxf7+ Kd8 (27... Ke8 $4 {doesn't work this time because of} 28. Qg8+ Bf8 29. Qxf8#) 28. Rxd7+ Kc8 29. Rxd6 b1=Q+ 30. Kxh2 {is still dangerous for Black, but the game should end in a draw after} Qe1 {The point is that once White's queen helps close in on the enemy king, Black will give perpetual by ...Qh4+, . ..Qe1+, etc.} 31. Qd7+ (31. Qg8+ Kc7 32. Rxc6+ bxc6 33. Qxa8 Qh4+ 34. Kg1 Qe1+ $11) 31... Kb8 32. Rxe6 {Covering e1 against the perpetual, but Black can still hang on by a thread.} Qh4+ 33. Kg1 a5 {Black's rook and king will escape through the side door (the a-file), so now at last White should force the draw:} 34. Qd6+ Ka7 35. Qc5+ Ka6 36. Rxc6+ bxc6 37. Qxc6+ Ka7 38. Qc7+ $11) 26...Ke8 27. Rxf8+ Bxf8 28. Qhg6+ Ke7 (28... Kd8 29. Qxf8+ Kc7 {reaches the position after 30...Kc7 a move sooner than the game.}) 29. Q8f7+ Kd8 30. Qxf8+ Kc7 $19 {White has finished an enormous meal and is actually ahead in material. Unfortunately, the b-pawn is a monster. I haven't analyzed this position to the point of exhaustion (either my own or the possibilities, though it's reasonably close in at least the first case), but it seems to me that Black is already winning here.} 31. Qf1 Rf8 32. Qg3+ (32. Qe1 e5 33. c3 Rd8 34. Kxh2 Qxd2 35. Qxd2 Rxd2 36. Qb1 {will lose too, e.g.} Ne7 {(with the idea of ... Nd5xc3)} 37. c4 Nc6 38. Kh3 Nb4 39. Qh7+ (39. g4 e4 $19) 39... Kb6 40. Qg6+ Kc5 41. Qb1 (41. g4 Rd3+ $19) 41... Nd3 $19 {followed by e4-e3-e2-e1Q.}) 32... e5 33. Qfe1 Qf5 34. Qf3 Qxc2 35. Qfd1 (35. Qxf8 b1=Q 36. Qf7+ Kb6 37. Qxb1 Qxb1+ 38. Kxh2 Qxa2 $19) 35... Qxd1 36. Qxd1 Rf2 37. Qe1 (37. Kxh2 Rxd2 38. Qe1 {comes to the same thing.}) (37. Qc2 $2 Rf1+ $19 ({Even if White's king were on h2, Black would still win with} 37... Rxd2 $19)) 37... Rxd2 38. Kxh2 Rc2 39. Qb1 Nd4 {Threatening to run the e-pawn.} 40. Kg3 Kd6 (40... e4 41. Kf4) 41. Kg4 Rxg2+ 42. Kh5 Rc2 43. Kg5 e4 44. Kf4 Kd5 45. Qh1 Rf2+ 46. Kg3 Rf3+ 47. Kg4 e3 ({After} 47... e3 {White cannot force a perpetual, e.g.} 48. Qh5+ Rf5 49. Qh1+ Kc5 {and White is already out of good checks. From here, Black can play 50...e2 followed by 51...b1Q 52.Qxb1 Rf1 and queening.}) 0-1

[SteveBolduc]

Voilà John, il n'y a qu'à utiliser la fonction : suppression des commentaires..
[Event "Old TCEC - Game of the Month 3"]
[Site "http://www.tcec-chess.org"]
[Date "2010.11.26"]
[Round "8.3"]
[White "Houdini 1.03a"]
[Black "Rybka 4 Exp-61"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D46"]
[PlyCount "163"]
[EventDate "2010.11.21"]
[Event "Old TCEC - Game of the Month 2"]
[Site "http://www.tcec-chess.org"]
[Date "2010.08.01"]
[Round "1.3"]
[White "Shredder 12"]
[Black "Naum 4.2"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A06"]
[PlyCount "94"]
[EventDate "2010.07.30"]

[John Bleau]

Merci, Steve

[John Bleau]

Une immortelle de Karpov
[Event "03, Linares"]
[Site "03, Linares"]
[Date "1983.??.??"]
[EventDate "?"]
[Round "?"]
[Result "1-0"]
[White "Anatoli Karpov"]
[Black "Gyula Sax"]
[ECO "B81"]
[WhiteElo "?"]
[BlackElo "?"]
[PlyCount "77"]

[Serge Champetier]

En ce qui me concerne, la partie Kasparov-Topalov est certainement l'une des plus impressionnates que j'ai jamais vues.
Kasparov = plus grand joueurs d'échecs de tous les temps!?

[Réjean Tremblay]

Les grands-maîtres modernes considèrent que c'est Kasparov le plus grand de tous les temps. Kasparov lui-même considère que c'est Fischer. La question a été posé à Korchnoi qui a bien connu les 2 et a répondu Fischer.

Quand on pense que Fischer aurait été malade de la 2ème à la 5ème partie contre Petrosian, et que cela a été précédé de 20 victoires consécutives avant et 4 consécutives après...

Mais Kasparov a terminé 1er ex-aequo 10 ans de suite dans les tournois.

Éternelle question sans réponse claire.

Reggie

[SteveBolduc]

Kasparov = plus grand joueurs d'échecs de tous les temps!?

Selon mes recherches le plus grand joueur de tous les temps fut Miroslav Filip qui, à 6 pieds 8 pouces était imposant.

Pour les incrédules : http://chessgames.com/player/miroslav_filip.html

J'ai vu qq part le chiffre de 6 pieds 9 pouces mais je ne peux le retrouver..

Amusez vous à me contre dire..

[benoitstpierre]

Max Euwe devait être dans les grands, si on multiplie la taille par l'ELO.

[Foudoudou]

[Event "Vienna"]
[Date "1872"]
[White "Hamppe,Carl"]
[Black "Meitner,Philip"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C25"]

[felixd]

Pourquoi la partie est-elle nulle à la fin? Je ne comprends pas...

Bien entendu Rxb7 ne fonctionne pas du tout, mais Ra4?

EDIT: Ah. Fc4!!!
D'accord, j'ai rien dit. Super partie!!

[SteveBolduc]

Une partie avec un thème tout à fait spécial.

Je la dédie à J.-R. Boutin qui m'en a parlé à Rimouski récemment.
[Event "Palma de Mallorca"]
[Site "Palma de Mallorca"]
[Date "1968.??.??"]
[Round "16"]
[White "Medina Garcia, Antonio Angel"]
[Black "Gligoric, Svetozar"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C93"]
Je vous laisse deviner lequel thème finalement cette partie illustre ??

[J.-R. Boutin]

Une partie avec un thème tout à fait spécial.

Je la dédie à J.-R. Boutin qui m'en a parlé à Rimouski récemment.

Je vous laisse deviner lequel thème finalement cette partie illustre ??

Merci Steve pour cette délicatesse. J'imagine que le thème est:
L'art de gagner une partie sans aucune capture de pion ou de pièce en 29 coups