SuperStef a écrit :Tom O'Donnell IM
Having spoken to a few Masters, it seemed to me that the general consensus was that the event should have at least two sections. With only one section should a Master play a bad game or two they are paired with A-players and Candidate Masters for much of the rest of the event. A couple told me that this was their last CO as they were tired of getting these sorts of pairings.
Le MI O'Donnell dit plus loin
MI Tom O'Donnell
It is not the GMs that were complaining about the format, as far as I could tell. It was players who were not happy being paired up or down constantly, or like a yoyo. The Ottawa Chess Club site gives an example of someone who is not a GM, and who was not happy with his pairings, or the pairing system used.
L'organisateur du tournoi répond au MI O'Donnell
Gordon Ritchie
The reason we asked players to fill out a survey at the end of the tournament was precisely to replace this sort of speculation with hard information about what people really preferred. We have not yet tabulated all the responses but I can tell you that when I looked through the pile of forms the support for a single section was overwhelming. We will publish the results when the tally is complete.
Il faut remarqué que le le MI O'Donnell ne semble avoir qu'avoir discutté qu'avec ses pairs, c'est-à-dire des maitres. Se peut-il que le MI O'Donnell, tout comme semble le faire M. Tremblay, ne se soucit très peu de ce que pense les GMI et les amateurs, incluant les experts?
Que c'est bien de valoriser seulemet ce que l'on veut! L'altruisme à bien meilleur gout quand présente chez son prochain qui ne fait pas partie de ntre très petit groupe qui a ses propres objectifs très particluiers.
Puis on se plaint que ça marche mal ...
Daniel
